This Site is Unauthorized by Farmers Insurance Group

Farmers Insurance Sucks T-ShirtFarmers Insurance SucksFarmers Insurance Sucks T-Shirt

Home | Farmers Insurance Rated Worst! | Farmers Insurance Agent Info | Lawsuits| Direct Repair Program
  Forum(Submit Complaint) | Contact Dept of Insurance! | Farmers Insurance & Colossus | Sitemap | Search
Need Help/Lowballed? | Links | Blog | Our Story-Defending Free Speech | Lawyers | Contact Us

Posted on Wed, Oct. 05, 2005

Provider of home coverage probed




CONTRA COSTA TIMES

A state agency is investigating whether divisions of Farmers Insurance Group, the state’s second largest provider of homeowner policies, is illegally overcharging its customers.

The California Department of Insurance has "received numerous complaints and continues to receive complaints" that the Los Angeles-based company has violated an array of its stated policies, according to a notice of non-compliance.

Farmers Insurance could be charged an administrative penalty of up to $10,000 per intentional act, department spokesman Gary Gartner said. The number of incidents will be determined at a hearing slated for early 2006.

Farmers Insurance said in a prepared statement it is in discussions with the Department of Insurance and is confident it can resolve the matter "in the best interests of our customers."

"Our goal is to offer a rating plan that prices insurance products accurately and equitably for our California customers," the company said.

Among other things, the department believes Farmers Insurance surcharges policyholders for fire, wind, hail, lightning and earthquake damage, even though its rules prohibit such charges; exacts fees for claims losses even when those losses are ultimately withdrawn, denied or covered by customer deductibles; and often arbitrarily assigns a premium based on "very high risk of fire danger," when its database doesn’t indicate a home’s proximity to a fire hydrant.

On top of administrative penalties, the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights argues Farmers Insurance should pay refunds to any customer who was improperly charged.

"This company thinks it can break the law without being held accountable," said Harvey Rosenfield, founder of the Santa Monica-based consumer watchdog group, which petitioned the Department of Insurance to participate in the proceedings. "It’s an arrogant, outrageous practice by an arrogant, outrageous company."

James Temple covers real estate for the Contra Costa Times. Reach him at 925-977-8534 or jtemple@cctimes.com.

This site is published as a public service to warn consumers of the business practices of Farmers Insurance Group.  This site is in no way affiliated, connected with, or sponsored by Farmers Insurance Group or any of its subsidiaries. All content and information on this site is my opinion or the opinion of those referenced. This site is for educational purposes. The information in the Forums or from other people, blogs or web sites  are provided at face value, we have not confirmed  any of these stories/opinions.  Copyrighted material has been used for non-commercial purposes only.  By accessing this site you agree to immediately contact us to report any incorrect data or misrepresentations of facts. We are not responsible for accuracy in story content. Individuals, news organizations, companies or government agencies referenced on this web site do not endorse this web site and are not affiliated with it (copyrighted materials used without permission). Links to any other sites are for informational purposes only and should not be considered an endorsement of the site.
Copyright 2005 -  FarmersInsuranceGroupSucks.com - All Rights Reserved - Gripe site about Farmers Insurance